Solving Corporate Problems with Training
I remember the days when Kirkpatrick's Four-Level
Training Evaluation Model and ADDIE came on the scene both methods work fine
for the corporate training bubble that must prove results to maintain training
budgets. However blinders on evaluation and measurement can be a self-justifying
delusion. It is one thing to prove someone learned the knowledge you present to
them and yet another that is solved a corporate problem or boosted sales. Are
we measuring grades of sales people, or are we measuring revenues. Drilling
deeper, did the training program address the real problem why the company
invested in the training program.
Case in point: the training department
can prove they trained everyone in sales the sales channel. Even that they knew
in information. However because the product is poor and management does not
listen the real outcome of increased sales can never be achieved.
Kirpatrics: Reaction, Learning, Behavior, Results. Does
not take into account Malcolm Knowles Andragogy, about learner being individual
based, and perhaps represents a total disconnect from Adult Learning theory. In
my 25 of sales marketing I have been in untold sales and product training
programs that were complete mismatches with attitudes and feeling of the
trainees.
ADDIE and Kirpatric methods are also weak in the business
analysis and the human background parts of solving organizational issues. Will
the business both accept and be ready to handle the changed behavior? Will the
audience go beyond tests and change behavior, like sexual harassment? These
must be in sync.
In the case of my High School Training Video “The Physics
of Shop Safety” the issue is fooling around in class and fear of how to handle
power tools. The experience of power
tools with them is completely new, loud and aggressive. Over a three-week
period we leverage the messages in the video to provide the student with a
feeling of mastery, control and self-confidence. The results of this mentoring were
quite remarkable. The video along with the multimedia PowerPoint works with
handouts and sets the stage for the hands-on mentoring.
In contrast to Kirkpatric the “Human Performance
Technology” model takes a broader view on situation analysis. What is key to
any training program that request change of the student is that the surrounding
environment must change with it? Corporations by their nature are top down
obedience instruction. Senior and interdepartmental managers must also adopt
the changes and be ready for the new changes requested of students. If the
environmental/social issues within the corporation we synchronized with the
training we are wasting time in the minds of the student.
The problem is that corporate training departments,
usually under HR or marketing, do not have that kind of corporate leverage. An
instruction designer cannot say to the VP of sales that the sales force is
angry because they are told to call dead leads, and that is why sales are
failing. Or tell an assembly line filled with defective parts that quality is
job one. If you want to hide in your figures use testing outcome numbers Kirkpatrick
is classic corporate stuff. If you have the leverage acquire the actual
performance numbers Human Performance Technology is your choice. Training
someone to be a formula one racer does you no good when you return them to
their 1970’ AMC Gremlin.
Remember outcomes do not change until the true causes of
the problem are altered. To drill down deeper refer to “Human Performance Technology.” Below is a PDF to Chyung entire book Foundations of Instructional and Performance
Technology which is
an excellent walk through Performance Technology.
References
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training
Evaluation Model: Analyzing Training Effectiveness. (n.d.). Retrieved November
10, 2014, from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/kirkpatri
Chyung , S 2008 Foundations of Instructional and Performance
Technology, Page 163, HRD Press, Inc. .
Amherst . Massachusetts Retrieved November
10, 2014 from: https://downloads.hrdpressonline.com/files/3420080326114240.pdf
Close,
R. 2014 The Physics of Shop Safety By Richard Close. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 10, 2014, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ehSY4pD4NU&feature=youtu.be
Comments