Who is in control of knowledge
I watch these videos at
the beginning of the Leaning Styles course and perhaps see them in a different
perspective now. What still remains is a lack of understanding in of the
theorists on the deeper dynamics of poverty / trauma in a Adult Learner’s life
and how that impacts learning methods. In addition human culture is mentioned
in passing However a clear understanding on how each culture views learning as
different and how personal experience impacts learning is simply brushed over.
Adult Children of Alcoholics or abuse adults have many issues that impact Adult
Learning theory and methods. Yes Cunningham is right in that we have to
deconstruct social injustice however we need to replace it with empowerment of individual
by deconstructing negative values and reconstructing with positive and
productive ones.
Knowledge is a fact
wrapped in a community of context. Knowledge is quantitative (factual) and qualitative
wrapped in culture and experience. A peach is a quantitative fact if I like to
eat a peach is a qualitative context. Context is what makes a fact or object relevant
to someone personal experience. Someone may love peaches but not eat anything a
Jew offered to them. Context is complex and difficult to test. Although both
Cunningham and Mezirow (1997) mention social impact
they provide little of any detail of culture value systems. Yet the adult
educators or urban social workers are forced to deal with the individual values
from a life of abuse.
Case in point: in my
surveys of Community Learning Centers both here and Africa. Require that the
student feel “Safe” both physically and emotionally. Once this takes place
learning can begin. Safety is an entitlement concept of the college student.
Therefore it is not on radar screen of a college level research project or
Adult Learning methods. To a young urban girl in the hood, high grades will be
a source of ridicule pain not success, it is not safe to smart. Her value
system are the reverse of a college student in Kolb’s (1975) research.
On Power
In Mezirow, J Video He states a key issue on the purpose of
Adult Learning and its twin sister Public Media. That. “We are trapped by our
frameworks of reality. We can control this, we can change this.” On the issue
of power and knowledge the big question is exactly who is “we,” on who is to be
in control? If we are working the Adult Learning fields of government,
corporations, military and corporate compliance then it is the institution that
is the “we” in control with learning for compliance/process sake. On the other
hand if we are delivering Adult Learning to the public sector, community
outreach, literacy, urban or foreign development then the “We” in control is
the empowered the individual with greater resources to facts, decision making,
values and social empowerment.
Yet, if we are in K-12
or Higher Ed we are stuck in between authoritarian control through testing and
individual empowerment through great cognitive decision making and character
development. With Internet digital democracy of public learning the “we” is
global communities of interest. Digital democracy being perhaps the dream of
Dewey (1916) and Friere (1993)
In the case of media we
also have disinformation as power in the case of Fox news who’s listeners full
believe it is “fair and objective” when the rest of the world news services
clear see it as NRC propaganda. Context is very relative.
So the question of power
is who cuts your paycheck and who do you conform to. Perhaps we should have a
dialog about the abuse of Knowledge out of context is an abuse or power.
Close, R.
(2013). Global Education Magazine. Issue 5 Page 44 to 55 from http://www.globaleducationmagazine.com/global-education-magazine-5/
Cunningham, P.
YouTube 9,14,2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=g5By1ta4HXo
Dewey, J.
(1916). Democracy and education. New York: The MacMillan Company.
FREIRE, P.
(1993) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York, Continuum).
Mezirow, J. (1997)
Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice from http://www.dlc.riversideinnovationcentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Transformative-Learning-Mezirow-1997.pdf
Kolb, D. A.
& Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C.
Cooper (Ed.) Theories of Group Process, London: John Wiley.
Comments